
Software
Stability Model (SSM)
A Half-Day Tutorial
Dr. Mohamed E.
Fayad
Professor of Computer
Engineering
Computer Engineering
Dept., College of Engineering
San José State
University
One Washington
Square, San José, CA 95192-0180
Ph: (408)
924-7364, Fax: (408) 924-4153
E-mail:
m.fayad@sjsu.edu
http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/fayad
Software Stability Model [1, 2, 3, 4] is a
radically new and a disruptive innovation in the
field of software engineering. It promotes a
holistic approach of how any software
development effort should be undertaken,
different from the approaches that we see today.
SSM can be used to build systems in any domain.
Software Stability Model promotes a way of
building software such that the software is not
tied to any specific domain or application
context. SSM fundamentally targets the problem
of low reuse; high costs, phasing out software
solutions, components with great impedance
mismatch and more. Research and development done
for the Software Stability Model will enable
practitioners and researchers of software
engineering to leverage new ways of developing
software that solve these problems. The methods
employed in designing software using SSM methods
aid in advancing our understanding of how to do
requirement analysis that is long lived and hits
right at what is being aimed at. SSM will not
only advance the field of software engineering
but also benefit Knowledge Engineering in
general. SSM concepts hold true for many
engineering disciplines, not just software. SSM
fundamentally targets the problem of low reuse;
high costs, phasing out of software solutions,
components with great impedance mismatch and
more. Research and development done for the
Software Stability Model will enable the
practitioners and researchers of software
engineering to look at new ways of developing
software that solve these problems.
Self-Adaptable,
Self-Scalable, Stability, Self-Manageable, Easy
Extensible, Self-Configurable with Unlimited
Reuse:
Software that is
architected and designed on the lines of SSM is
done in a way that makes it and self-adaptable
in nature i.e. separation of concerns between
functionality sets is extremely well done. As
SSM steers the designer toward a
solution-strategy that employs a generic stable
core, SSM enables the solution to be well-suited
and adaptable to a variety of typical changes in
the application context by ensuring that
adaptation is limited to just the application
context specific outer layer of the software
longevity, high returns on investments,
self-configurability, self-customizability,
self-manageability, Easy Extensibility with
unlimited reusability of the artifacts
developed and much more.
The advantages of
SSM
1. With SSM there is no need
for re-inventing the wheels comparing to the
traditional software methodology such as Spiral
Model [5] and Reusable model [6] that means
there is no maintenance
2. SSM creates products and
components that machine and platform independent
3. SSM creates unlimited reuse
of unified software architectures on Demand (USA
on-Demand).
4. SSM generates assets that
stable over time and have high return on
investments.
5. SSM represents the core
knowledge [7] of unlimited applicability that is
self-adaptable, Self-Scalable, Stability,
Self-Manageable, Easy Extensible,
Self-Configurable with Unlimited Reuse.
6. SSM is used as a method of
Domain Analysis, Analysis and Understand the
software requirements that we called the problem
and generates an Unlimited Solution to the
problem.
References
[1]
M.E. Fayad and A. Altman. “Introduction to
Software Stability,” Communications of the ACM,
Vol. 44, No. 9, Sept. 2001, pp. 95-98
[2] M.E. Fayad.
“Accomplishing Software Stability,”
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 1,
January 2002
[3] M.E. Fayad.
“How to Deal with Software Stability,”
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 3, March
2002
[4] M.E. Fayad and S.
Wu. “Merging Multiple Conventional Models in One
Stable Model,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.
45, No. 9, 2002.
[5]
Boehm, B.
"A Spiral Model of Software
Development and Enhancement",
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, ACM,
11(4):14-24, August 1986
[6]
Kyo C. Kang (Pohang
University of Science and Technology),
Sholom G. Cohen,
Robert R. Holibaugh,
James M. Perry,
A. Spencer Peterson.
CMU/SEI Report Number: CMU/SEI-92-SR-004.
Software Engineering Institute, January 1992.
[7]
M. E. Fayad,
H. A. Sanchez, S. G
.K. Hegde, A. Basia, and A. Vakil. “Software
Patterns, Knowledge Maps, and Domain Analysis”.
Boca Raton, FL:
Auerbach Publications, Taylor & Francis Catalog
#: K16540, December 2014. ISBN-13:
978-1466571433
A Pamphlet of 25-30 pages
will be handed to the participants which
contains this summary, 4 columns, and 2 short
papers